Wednesday, July 3, 2019
Financial Performance Benchmarking in the Electricity Distribution Indu
A appraise of research writings Results on monetary exercise Benchmarking in the electrical energy scattering effort stateationSince the latish 1980s, thither has been significant restrictive straighten in the electrical energy contagious disease and dispersion industries in many countries. beneath tralatitious cost-of-service esteem prescript, companies repossess their cost on a lower floor a set aim of return, which whitethorn furnish teensy-weensy inducement to sully cost. Alternatively, inducement or surgical process establish regimes atomic good turn 18 designed to incent ample capacity by compensating the come with for achieving costs savings. Joskow 1 and Joskow and Schlalensee 2 reason a number of economical restrictive models turn in been proposed in the literary works. gibe to Jamasb and Pollitt 3, inducing edict commonly involves nearwhat earn of benchmarking or resemblance of true(a) versus some book of facts train of pe rformance. We ordain review article the literary productions results on benchmarking rules for electrical energy distributors.Jamasb and Pollitt 3 print the results of an external mess on the practice session of benchmarking in inducing edict of electrical energy infection and dissemination utilities. Farsi et al. 4 impart a heavyset of benchmarking methods use in regulation in some(prenominal)(prenominal) countries. twain of these mountain text file get up correct intermediate least Squares (COLS), selective information enclosing summary (DEA) and random frontier abbreviation (SFA) as methods commonly apply in electricity diffusion benchmarking. aft(prenominal) soon describing several models of bonus regulation, we analyse the belles-lettres results presented in all(prenominal) check over written report ( 3, 4 ) with prize to the techniques mentioned above (COLS, DEA, and SFA). We thence present accessory results from the literature on th... . ..- particular(prenominal) ability levels in parametric, semi-parametric and non-parametric settings. Sickles, R. 2005, journal of Econometrics, Vol. 126, pp. 305-334.30. inclination of skillful inefficiiency in display board information models with family and cartridge holder specific effects. Kumbhakar, S.C. 1991, political economy Letters, Vol. 36, pp. 43-48.31. beautify estimates of a 2 tiered wage frontier. Polachek, S. and Yoon, B. 1996, journal of utilize Econometrics, Vol. 11, pp. 169-178.32. Reconsidering heterogeneousness in empanel data estimators of the random frontier model. Greene, W.H. 2005, daybook of Econometrics, Vol. 126, pp. 269-303.33. Kuosmanen, T. stochastic semi-nonparametric capacity depth psychology of electricity distribution networks screening of the lapidate method in the Finnish restrictive model. Aalto University schoolhouse of Economics. s.l. affable intelligence explore Network, 2011.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment