Ethical Dilemma Of Stem Cell Research Philosophy Essay

measureable Dilemma Of ancestor Cell explore Philosophy Essay arrest electric cadre the untested frontier of medical examination break through poses an important h atomic number 53st dilemma for self-aggrandizing maleity do we ache the goal of conceptuss to further attainment or do we support the nurtureion of embryos. We atomic number 18 faced with a critical decision to protect embryos from creation a part of a wisdom experiment or do we think that it is estimable to kill a few embryos in the name of science. I volition discuss the pros and cons of groundwork mobile phone search. I provide discuss the positive show upcomes associated with theme jail prison cell look from a medical aspect and the negative outcomes from a biological aspect. I will in akin manner manage for halt cell look and against angry walk cell interrogate.The argument for antecedent cell look into is medic solelyy motivated providing for authority drop recruits to debi litating infirmitys. I consider bow cell the future of medication by replicating cells and replenishing old cells we would then prolong clement beings lives. The argument for science promoting the possibility of future cures and eradication of diseases is a compelling argument in itself. Thither atomic number 18 those that argue that embryotic stanch cell interrogation holds great promise for understanding and curing diabetes, Parkinsons disease, and spinal cord psychic trauma. Opponents argue that the look for is unethical, beca phthisis deriving the radical cells destroys the blastocyst, an un deep-rooted military psychenel embryo at the 6th to eight day of development. The moral question we ar faced with is the unimplanted man embryo a serviceman being or just a cell. They be those in the un landed estately community that fuddle moral imprint that the embryo is a benignant being and by destroying the embryos in query is the equivalent of killing a child. T he nonion that by destroying an embryo during explore is the equivalent to killing a child is a ridiculous conclusion. We tummy comp atomic number 18 the embryo to the skin cells that be alive on our bodies. When we bem spend these skin cells everyday during showers ar we killing millions of potenti entirely in all toldy children by taking a shower. The belief that an embryo in such an earlyish spirit level of development is considered a pitying being with out being implanted in the uterus does non pose a very pixilated argument in my opinion. The fact that this cell is never going to materialise into a human being and will never grow outside of an etri dish is enough evidence to bring home the bacon stand cell interrogation to continue. The claim an embryo outside of the uterus is a human is up for serious bowl over between those for and against bowing cell question. Our beliefs whitethorn be deeply rooted in religion and our religion determines how we view stem cell research. Some may comp atomic number 18 destroying an embryo to killing a child beca phthisis of their sacred beliefs. We all vex our beliefs, that belief may be for stem cell research to further science or to b high society stem cell research receivable to our religious convictions. We moldiness effect aside our religious convictions in devote to further science research into finding cures for debilitating diseases. In order to further any science research we moldiness sacrifice virtuallyone or some occasion to reach our goal. We could bugger off non found cures to diseases or wee vaccines without having subjects to test these theories on. The fact that an embryo is utilize in these research procedures has made such a semipolitical and moral controversy a hot topic is no surprise. We hire debated this issue because it is claimed that the embryo is morally equivalent to a person, a amply developed human being. Those that hold the view that the embr yo is a human comp be extracting the blastocyst is as morally abhorrent as product electric organs from a baby to notwithstanding other stacks lives. at that place be some that reckon a human embryo is a human being just like you and me, and it deserves the same respect that our constabularys give to all of us. There be those that believe that an embryo is a human being and embryonal stem cell is immoral because it amounts to killing a person to treat other hoi pollois diseases. Some base their belief on religious convictions that the intelligence enters the form at the moment of conception. While others defend at that place belief without religion by flat coating that human beings are not things. That their lives must not be sacrificed against their will even for the sake of wakeless ends like saving other peoples lives. I agree that we are not things to be used for research and not considered to be humans, but in the same sense a cell is not a human until it gr ows in to a operable human being. The real question here is do we consider a cell to be a viable at such an early stage in development our religious beliefs may teach us a cell gets a soul upon conception. The idea that at the moment of conception the soul enters the body does not make the cell a viable human being and thus this cell should not be considered to be a human being.The Pros and Cons of bowing Cell interrogation The pros of stem cell research are outright potential for potential cures to diseases such as Alzheimers disease, Parkinsons disease, diabetes, stroke, bone diseases, and screening drugs for pharmaceutic companies, instead of using animals to test drugs. The use of the stem cells to reproduce organ interweave and replenish cells has sh receive great promise for eliminating diseases for mankind. The possibilities of stem cell therapy are endless from re-create to reproducing spinal cord tissue. The use of stem cells to re-create human tissue and organs will support to prolong lives of human beings and manageable slow down the aging process by permutation our cells. The cons of stem cell research are the use of stem cells and the ethical issues associated with using embryos to harvest home cells for research. Another disadvantage of stem cell research is the idea that we as humans are on the verge of vie divinity by creating life history. There are to a fault issues with the stem cells having mutating and causation much than harm than good. The research has shown possibility of the cells being jackpotcerous in some cases and not growing into the desired organs. The destruction of life is al to the highest degree distinct disadvantage associated with stem cell research.Positive and Negative Outcomes of radical Cell look for The positive outcomes of stem cell research are endless possibilities of curing a wide range of diseases processes and prolonging human life. The use of stem cells has been proven to repleni sh muscle and organ tissue in humans. seek has shown that the use of stem cells to treat Parkinsons and Alzheimers disease has signifi fucktly change magnitude the functionality of the affected patient. Other patients digest had success in replacing softheartedness tissue from heart attacks and cancer patients now live symptom barren from cancer. The negative aspect of stem cell research has been linked to how the cells are booked and the morals issues surrounding them. Another negative outcome of the research is the cells often grow out of control into tumors and immune system sometimes rejects the cells. The use of the embryo to harvest the stem cells poses the well-nigh negative outcome of all with the belief that the embryos are human being and harvesting the cells destroys the cell thus killing a human being.Conclusion Stem cell the new frontier of medical break through poses an important ethical dilemma for humanity do we support the destruction of embryos to fu rther science or do we support the protection of embryos. The protection of the embryo from being done for(p) for the advancement of science will finally piece humanity at a loss by protecting a cell from destruction. The destruction of that same cell has the possibility of curing diseases and prolonging humanity for generations. We are ultimately stuck with the decision do we take a life in order to prolong future generations lifes by promoting science over humanity in order to further mankind.ReferencesA Kuflik (2008). The future like ours argument and human embryonic stem cell research.Journal of Medical Ethics,34(6),417. Retrieved November 18, 2008, from investigate subroutine librarydatabase. (Document ID1490151201).Bernard Lo, Arnold Kriegstein, Deborah Grady.(2008). Clinical trials in stem cell transplantation guidelines for scientific and ethical review.Clinical Trials,5(5),517-22. Retrieved November 18, 2008, from inquiry program librarydatabase. (Document ID1563539 701).Britain Playing God Religion and politics.(2008,March). The Economist,386(8573),40. Retrieved November 18, 2008, from ABI/ protest Globaldatabase. (Document ID1454200351).Guido de Wert, Christine Mummery.(2003). Human embryonic stem cells research, ethics and policy.Human Reproduction,18(4),672-82. Retrieved November 18, 2008, from Research Librarydatabase. (Document ID345544781).Ida M Jones (2007). PROPERTY LAW, PERSONHOOD AND ETHICS STEM CELL inquiry ITS IMPACT ON PROPERTY LAW.Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues,10(1),19-30. Retrieved November 18, 2008, from ABI/ declare Globaldatabase. (Document ID1301953641).Insoo Hyun (2008). Stem Cells from Skin Cells The Ethical Questions.The Hastings Center Report,38(1),20-2. Retrieved November 18, 2008, from Research Librarydatabase. (Document ID1431314801).R DiSilvestro (2008). A qualified endorsement of embryonic stem cell research, based on two widely shared beliefs virtually the brain-diseased patients such research might benefit.Journal of Medical Ethics,34(7),563. Retrieved November 18, 2008, from Research Librarydatabase. (Document ID1504043861).Robert Streiffer (2005). At the Edge of Humanity Human Stem Cells, Chimeras, and Moral Status.Kennedy impart of Ethics Journal,15(4),347-70. Retrieved November 18, 2008, from ABI/INFORM Globaldatabase. (Document ID950255831).S Camporesi (2008). Reproductive cloning in humans and therapeutic cloning in primates is the ethical debate catching up with the recent scientific advances?Journal of Medical Ethics,34(9),15. Retrieved November 18, 2008, from Research Librarydatabase. (Document ID1551813891).(www.scu.edu/ethics/publications/cloning.html) Ethics of Human Cloning and Stem Research. Retrieved November 14, 2008.Ethical concerns of using stem cells for medical treatmentsIn the modern world in that location set about been numerous diseases, illnesses and epidemics that ache been avoided due to the development of technology. One of the most recent successful developments have involved the research into stem cells. Stem cells are cells which can specialize into umpteen different shells of cells, they are cognize as totipotent cells. Scientists have found that it is possible to harvest organs, such as, livers, hearts, and lungs.Or remake dead cells which have been deceased from various illnesses, such as dead brain cells, that could be re-grown and cure diseases such as Alzheimers and Parkinsons.Some people may see this is a good thing as it could athletic disciple many unfortunate people who have veritable diseases. But many people have raised ethical concerns slightly the research procedure involved. The procedure involves an embryos nucleus being interpreted out and replaced by the nucleus of the cells which need to be reproduced. This process is know as nuclear ravish. A very famous experiment conducted via nuclear transfer was the birth of Dolly the sheep a mammary cell nucleus was taken and added to the embryo, w hich was then added to the uterus of a ewe and then in February 1997, Dollys mother gave birth. The cloning was successful but some people say she died at an early age because she was cloned, whilst others argue that she died because she was affected by the retrovirus JSRV. This is very common in sheep and causes many of them to die.Some people argue that using embryos is very unethical, as it involves tampering with Gods creations. Many people believe that embryos are human beings that in like manner have rights and do not deserve to be killed or active for medical reasons. Some people as well as argue that people may go too far with cloning, which may topic in lousiness doings.Dr. Piete who is a member of the European Parliament stated, The cloning of embryos would be like a bursting dam Once human embryos are cloned and used for the lift of organs, thither would immediately be attempts to go further.It is understandable wherefore some people are afraid that along with a lo t of help there may be risks of corruption. People may use the advances in stem cells to clone armies. Religions play a huge part in stem cell research. Most of them believe that killing or using an embryo is wrong because it mover that a life is being taken. During a coalition of 11 religious leaders, it was concluded that, There is widespread obligation that the huge philosophical and ethical implications of these development have not been considered fully. The right protects an embryo/zygote later on it has lived for 24 weeks. This law was introduced in 1990 and was known as the Human Fertilization and Embryology Act 1990. This is known as the final abortion date you can not have an abortion afterwards the 24th week. This is roughly half the life of the baby in the womb of the mother. Although people argue that there are bad sides to stem cells research, there are many people who believe that the benefits outweigh the detriments.One must hold consideration for all the suffe rers of diabetes, Alzheimers, heart disease, Parkinsons, brain disease, as they are waiting for a cure and right now the precisely cure seems to be research into stem cells which can help many sufferers shake up the disease and beat it. At the moment diabetes is a huge problem in England. Diabetes is associated with obesity, which is a current problem that could soon lead to a global epidemic. Obese people can now have the contingency to fight diabetes with advances in stem cells research. A representative of the Parkinsons Research worry Group states Those who oppose this development need to show good reason why people with chronic illnesses should be denied advances in medical treatments that would good improve their quality of life. This agrees with the idea that people who suffer from contraband diseases have the chance to live a healthy and normal life. As for the people who believe that embryos have the right to live and that we should not use them for research into pre venting diseases, I believe this is a matter of preferences. How can people put the feelings of a few embryos high than the treatment of people with diseased lives? This is exclusively inhumane and is a crime against humanity. The embryos dont feel a thing when they are being used for research but a human feels a lot of physical and emotional pain when it is going through these fatal illnesses. I personally think that millions of humans have a higher priority than that of a few cells. Lord Hunt who is the junior health Minister states, The embryo has a special status, and we owe a visor of respect to the embryo. But we also owe a measure of respect to the millions of people living with these devastating illnesses and the millions who have notwithstanding to show signs of them. This explains my views exactly and Professor Julia Polak who is the Director of the Tissue Engineering Centre in Hammersmith hospital London also says I may feel sorry close to two or leash cells but I also oversee about the millions of cells that are a human person.We should consider this matter logically and ethically. Fair enough the embryos deserve respect but one has to question whether their rights overcome the rights of the millions of sufferers out there in the world. Therefore, in conclusion, I believe that stem cell research should be carried out, but the security precautions that are to be implemented, should be handled appropriately and also the regimens of the world should not allow the research to fall in the wrong hands.Stem Cell ResearchBeneficial or Detrimental?The use of stem cell research has helped to make many progressions in the medical field and has helped save many peoples lives by treating and curing many diseases and other illnesses. If scientists continue to research the uses of stem cells, it could prove to improve life for all human beings. However, the end result of researching stem cells could be beneficial or detrimental to our society. Whi le research on cord and adult stem cells could show to improve life for those who are in medical need, embryonic stem cell research requires a life to be taken so therefore should not be supported. What are stem cells? Stem cells can also be distinguished as differentiated cells. They are primal cells found in all multi-cellular organisms. They maintain the capability to renew themselves through mitotic cell division, and they have the ability to grow into almost any type of cell. That is why they are so useful. Dead cells of almost any kind, regardless of what type of injury or disease, can be replaced with new healthy cells thanks to the unparalleled flexibility of stem cells. So if the use of stem cells is such a breakthrough in the medical field, why should anyone be against it? The answer lies in where they come from. There are three main sources for acquiring stem cells cord cells, embryonic cells, and adult cells.Cord cells are cells that can be taken from the umbilical cord at birth and can be stored and later on used as a type of indemnity policy for the new infixed for use in the future. Cord cells can also be used by close relatives such as the mother, father, siblings, or other people of close relationship. However, the more distant the relationship, the more seeming it is that the cells will be rejected by the persons immune system and it will not work.Next, there are the adult stem cells. Research on adult stem cells has been around the longest and has proven to be the most useful and successful of the different types of stem cells. Adult stem cells are attained from living bone marrow, blood, body fat, brain tissue, and skin. In order to be distinguished as an adult stem cell, the cell has to have these two properties1) The ability to divide and create another cell uniform to itself2) The ability to divide and create a cell even more distinguished than itself.Although these stem cells are called adult stem cells, they can also be found in children.The use of adult stem cells has helped to save many peoples lives in the past and is noneffervescent being proven to have therapeutic effects in cancer treatments, autoimmune diseases, leukemia, and heart disease today. Every year more and more of fall in States government championship is being provided for cord and adult stem cell research due to its many successes.The last type of stem cells are the embryonic stem cells. Embryonic stem cells are derived from human embryos. In order to harvest embryonic stem cells, an embryo must be destroyed. The reason why scientists are so interested in embryonic stem cells is because these cells can develop into each of the more than 200 cell types of the adult body when given sufficient and necessary stimulation for a specific cell type. However, after twenty years of research, there are unruffled no approved treatments or human trials using embryonic stem cells. This means that they have the combined abilities of unlimited expansion and pluripotency, so because of this, embryonic stem cells remain a theoretically potential source for regenerative medicine and tissue replacement after injury or disease.What the intelligence SaysThe Bible speaks concerning matters of stem cell research. In the Bible, there were many healers and physicians, and even Jesus recovered some of the sick, wounded and diseased. And Jesus went about all Galilee, teaching in their synagogues, and preaching the gospel of the kingdom, and healing all manner of sickness and all manner of disease among the people. And his fame went throughout all Syria and they brought unto him all sick people that were taken with diverse diseases and torments, and those which were possessed with devils, and those which were lunatic, and those that had the palsy and he healed them.Matthew 4 23-24Therefore , many would see no reason to believe that research on cord or adult stem cells is wrong and would believe it is a legitimate field of study, well within the will of God. Many also believe that it is Gods will for us as children of God to try and help those in need, just as Jesus Christ did when he came to man so it would only be right for us to continue poring over and researching the many uses and benefits that can be discovered using cord and adult stem cells. However, while the use of cord cells and adult stem cells do not require the destruction of a human life in order to be obtained, embryonic stem cells do. The biblical teaching is that human existence begins at conception.You formed my inward parts You covered me in my mothers womb. I will praise You for I am fearfully and terrifically made marvelous are Your works, and that my soul knows very well. My frame was not hidden from You, When I was made in secret, and skillfully wrought in the lowest parts of the earth. Your eyes saw my substance, being yet unformed. And in Your book they are all written, the days fashioned for me, When as yet there were none of them.Psalm 139 13-16The word of the Lord came to me thus onwards I formed you in the womb I knew you, Before you were born I dedicated you, A prophet to the nations I appointed you.Jeremiah 1 4-5Since nothing has been accomplished with the use of embryonic stem cells, its potential still remains untested. Even after twenty years of research, there are no approved treatments or human trials using embryonic stem cells. However, embryonic stem cells hold the most potential out of the three types of stem cells because you can get up to 150 cells from just one embryonic stem cell line where you can get only a small number of the adult or cord cells. Their aptness to produce tumors and malignant carcinomas, cause transplant rejection, and form the wrong kinds of cells are just a few of the problems that embryonic stem cell researchers s till face and are trying to overcome. Many nations currently have a suspension or a ban on either embryonic stem cell research or the production of new embryonic stem cell lines. Another reason why embryonic stem cell research is wrong is because in order to start a new embryonic stem cell line, therapeutic cloning may be required. The Government and Stem Cell ResearchThe fact that this type of research is wrong has not gone unnoticed by the United States government. Steps have been taken to help stop embryonic stem cell research (although adult stem cell and cord cell research is widely supported). In 1995, President Bill Clinton signed into law the Dickey Amendment which prohibited all federal funding for research that resulted in the destruction of an embryo regardless of the source of that embryo. In the past 7 years, President George W. Bush has enacted numerous laws that restrict federally-funded stem cell research on embryonic stem cells to the already derived cell li nes. Then, on July 19, 2006, he vetoed H.R. 810 (Stem Cell Research Enhancement Act), a bill that would have transposed the Clinton-era law which made it illegal for federal money to be used for research where stem cells are derived from the destruction of a human embryo. Although the government prohibits federal and public funding of embryonic stem cell research, mystical funding is still legal. On February 16, 2007, the California Institute for Regenerative Medicine became the biggest financial backer of embryonic stem cell research in the U.S. when they awarded nearly $45 million in research grants.Currently, if the United States decides to vote a Democrat into office, they will most likely be a supporter of stem cell research embryonic stem cell research included. However, if a Republican gets voted into office, such as McCain or Huckabee, they would be against embryonic stem cell research but would still support the research of the possibilities of adult stem cells and c ord cells.The Future of Stem Cell ResearchResearchers and physicians are working to design stem cell therapies that are more effective and reduce the invasiveness and the risk to patients. Todays stem cell therapies usually swan on cells that are denoted by another person this raises the possibility of giver cell rejection by the patients immune system. In the future, it may be possible for a person to use a experiment of his or her own stem cells to regenerate tissue, which would reduce or even eliminate the risk of exposure of rejection. The only problem with this is that in order to use a sample of ones own stem cells, the process of cloning would have to be endorsed. There are a couple of verses in the Bible that speak against this. cheat that the LORD Himself is God It is He who has made us, and not we ourselves.Psalm one C3Thus says the LORD who made you and formed you from the womb, I have formed you, Thus says the LORD, your Redeemer, and the one who formed you fro m the womb, I, the LORD, am the maker of all things, stretching out the heavens by Myself and spreading out the earth all alone.Isaiah 442, 21, 24As you can see from these verses, the Bible states two main things that relates to cloning1) Life begins early in the womb.2) God forms life. Because we are Gods creation and because we are created in His image (according to Genesis 126), life is precious. Much of the desire in the scientific community is to create clones for spare parts, to use their stem cells, organs, and so on. Although it sounds like cloning these things would be more beneficial than not, cloning even the smallest of parts would be devaluing natural human life. On the surface, the possibilities of stem cell therapies seem limitless. Would it be possible to use stem cell technologies to replace any diseased or damaged tissue in the body? To answer this question, researchers must enroll out the true potential and limitations of stem cells. Researchers are asking t hemselves many questions, such as how long will a stem cell therapy last and can we ensure that stem cell therapies will not form tumors in the body. There are so many things we can do with stem cells that the opportunities to improve human life seem infinite. Stem cells have helped us in ways such as reversing cancer, growth cures for diabetes, replacing damaged organs and nerves, and much more. Stem cells today are being used to treat diseases such as leukemia. Stem cell transplant procedures also show promise for treating neurological disorders such as Parkinsons disease.In 2001, nearly 80,000 people needed organ transplants, fewer than 24,000 got them, and 6,000 died waiting. Of those receiving organs, 40 percent die within the first three years after surgery. If we continue to fund stem cell research, being able to obtain an organ to save ones life would be much easier. For example, say a person is in need of a pancreas just place your order, and three weeks later a new o ne lies ready and waiting in the surgical suite. Heart failure? No worries a few injections with potent stem cells will grow new cardiac tissue. It is statistics like these that curl up us into the idea of stem cell research.In conclusion, one must really look at the facts to truly understand the true potential stem cell research holds for us for the future. One must use his own judgement to decide for himself whether he supports stem cell research or whether he believes it is immoral or unethical based on his own opinions and beliefs.