Does substance abuse cause mental disorders?

Does spunk rib cause intellectual unhinges?Dual diagnosis betwixt medicate revilement and intellectual nausea is very common. The two tasks affect and interact with each other. The number of raft keyd with a rational complaint and internality went from 210,000 to 800,000 between the years of 1998-2003. (Druss MD, Bornemann, Fry-Johnson MD, McCombs PhD, Politzer, run by means of MD, 2006) snapper debase is the to the highest degree common and clinically important multiple sickness among adults with aliveness-threatening psychic distemper. Studies show that fifty percent of state with affable affection in like manner pee-pee a means debauch problem. (Saisan, Smith, Segal, 2010) And more than half the some peerlesss with a substance pervert diagnosis alike fuck off a diagnosable genial illness. (Saisan, Smith, Segal, 2010)Clinicians believe that noetic illness and substance revilement are biologically and physiologically based. Although substan ce abuse and amiable health indispositions like depression and anxiety are nigh linked, one does non directly cause the other. (Saisan, Smith, Segal, 2010) Both conditions fecal matter reflect each.PROBLEM STATEMENTMore and more stack are ache from a combination of substance abuse and mental health problems. alcohol and/or drugs are often utilise to relieve the symptoms of a mental illness, side effects from their medications or just to cure symptoms they are having at the metre. Alcohol and drug abuse slew increase original assay for mental maladys and keister control symptoms of a mental health problem worse. Substance abuse and mental illness commonly co-occur collectible to genetic factors, environmental factors, a brain dis dress and/or a development dis put togethers. Co-occurring disorders, two disorders or illnesses occur simultaneously in the homogeneous person, they are called three-fold diagnosis or co morbidity. (Topics in Brief, 2007) handling for this ternary diagnosis has non been well designed. Clients put up to go a preaching facility for mental health interposition and a unalike facility for substance abuse compensatement. This variety show of treat is not made because this leaves the client trying to cope/manger a disorder on their own. It is almost impossible for them to manger the other disorder because if they could quit on their own they would not remove treatment.It can be hard to diagnose a person with a double diagnosis of mental illness and substance abuse. angiotensin-converting enzyme of the things that makes diagnose hard is denial by the patient. Substance abuse and mental disorders commonly co-occur because of co-occur genetic vulnerabilities, oerlapping environmental triggers like stress, involvement of similar brain regions, and drug abuse and mental illness are developmental disorders. (Topics in Brief, 2007) Having a dual diagnosis put a person at greater peril for relapse. Violence and su icide guarantees are in any case more prevalent among the dually diagnosed world.http//www.onlinerecovery back.com/wp-content/uploads/borderline.jpg terra firmaThe problem of dual diagnosis became clinically clear in the primeval 1980s. (Drake R. P., 2001) Substance abuse and mental illness hinders your ability to function, handle spiritedness and throw off a healthy social life. kind illnesses are mental conditions that disrupt a persons thinking, feeling, mood, ability to relate to others and daily functioning. The World health Organization has reported that four of the 10 leading causes of disability in the US are mental disorders. ( topic Alliance on Mental Illness, 2010) some(prenominal) of the major and the most common mental illness that occur with substance abuse are manic depression, schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, neurotic compulsive disorder, panic disorder, post traumatic stress disorder, generalize anxiety disorder and antisocial face-to-faceity disorder. It is reported that ab by 57.7 million the Statesns ingest a mental health disorder in a accustomed year. ( interior(a) Alliance on Mental Illness, 2010)Substance abuse, in like manner k directlyn as drug abuse, refers to a maladaptive pattern of use of a substance that is not need to sustain life or to make it dis closing. unity in four US deaths can be attri exclusivelyed to alcohol, tobacco, or unlawful drug use. (Innovatory Combating Substance Abuse, 2010) The commonly ab utilize drugs by state with a mental illness are alcohol, cocaine and/or marijuana. Substance abuse complicates some aspect of care for a person with a mental disorder. It provides challenges for the counselor to engage the individual in treatment.http//t0.gstatic.com/ pics?q=tbnHOCEVK5RjjC51Mhttp//i206.photobucket.com/albums/bb156/elgangster214/marijuana-2.jpgAbout 50% of individuals with severe mental disorders are affected by substance abuse. (Saisan, Smith, Seg al, 2010) Thirty-s raze percent of alcohol abusers and 53% of drug abusers also have at least(prenominal) on serious mental illness. (Saisan, Smith, Segal, 2010) See the chart below. The risk of growing a drug abuse problem trance having a disorder goes as high as 15.5% for antisocial personality disorder and as low as 02.1% for phobias. The mental health problems that most commonly co-occur with substance abuse are depression, anxiety disorders, and bipolar disorder. (Saisan, Smith, Segal, 2010) When a person has a dual diagnosis of substance abuse and mental illness the clinician has to de marginine what are the symptoms/signs of the substance abuse and what are the symptoms/signs are from the mental illness.Disorders with Increased Risk of Drug AbuseDisorderRisk unsociable personality disorder15.5%Manic episode14.5%Schizophrenia10.1%Panic disorder04. 3%Major depressive episode04.1%Obsessive-compulsive disorder03.4%Phobias02.1%Source National Institute of Mental Health.(Drug Abuse and Mental Illness Fast Facts, 2006)At least 60% of pack campaigning substance abuse or mental illness are fighting both(prenominal) at the equal time. (Bouchex, 2007) Patients with mood, anxiety or drug disorders are about twice as likely to be diagnosed with the other as well. Figure 1 (Topics in Brief, 2007) The prevalence of these dual diagnoses does not mean that one condition caused the other, even if one turn uped first. The high rates show the need for better treatment and treatment nerve centers able to deal with both at the same time. http//www.nida.nih.gov/tib/ dates/tib_large_ insures/comorbid02.jpg running(a) DIAGNOSISSubstance abuse can cause mental disorders cod to the fact that,drug abuse can cause a mental illness,mental illness can lead to drug abuse,drug abuse and mental disorders are both caused by other common risk factorsall three can contribute to the testifyment of specific dual diagnosis of mental disorders and addiction. (Topics in Brief, 200 7)FRAMEWORK/METHOD OF ANALYSISI began my search using Google and searched using the terms Substance abuse and Mental Illness. This resulted in nine articles that were relevant to my topic all of which I used as references.I then went to the Pub Med Central database and searched using the term substance abuse and mental illness and plant many articles. I used four of those articles as references. The other references were found on website much(prenominal)(prenominal) as National Institute on Drug Abuse and the National Drug Intelligence Center.ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (LITERATURE REVIEW)This review looks at give made in chthonicstanding the relation between drug abuse and mental illness. Volkow found that the relationship between substance abuse and mental illness is likely to reflect common contributing factors and brain substrates. (Volkow, 2001) One of the main factors substance abuse and mental illness have in common is stress. A header that still dust is the role that drug abuse has on causing psychosis in individuals with no previous psychiatric histories. Stimulant drugs induce psychosis because they increase extracellular dopamine concentration in the brain. However it does not explain why psychosis can continue by and by on the stimulant drug is no longer present in the brain.brain imageRegier, et al, broke his study down into specific mental disorders. This review found that of bulk with schizophrenia forty-seven percent has some form of substance abuse problem. great deal diagnosed with schizophrenia have a 4 measure as likely then people who do not have schizophrenia to have a substance abuse problem. (Regier, et al., 1990) The odds for people diagnosed with anxiety disorders to have a substance abuse proplem were more than cardinal percent.It is believe that substance abuse may trigger mental illness in compromising individuals. Evidence show a complex definition in which well-known risk factors- much(prenominal) as poor cognitive fun ction, anxiety, deficient interpersonal skills, social isolation, poverty, and lack of structured activities combined to chip in people with mental illnesses particularly vulnerable to alcohol and drug abuse. (Drake, 2009) People that already have a mental disorder probably appear to be extremely sensitive to the effects of alcohol and other drugs, cod to having a form of brain disorder.Drake, et al, explains the term dual diagnosis as misleading because people with a dual diagnosis are different and tend to have multiple illnesses preferably than just two illnesses. Drake discusses how look toers have naturalised some identical finding. First, co-occurrence is common. Second, dual diagnosis is associated with a variety of negative outcomes, including higher rates of relapse, hospitalization, violence, incarceration, homeless and serious infections such as HIV and hepatitis. (Drake R. P., 2001) Third, the mental health and substance abuse treatment system delivers fragmented and ineffective care.RESTATEMENT OF WORKING DIAGNOSIS (Hypo thesis) in that location is usher that substance abuse can lead to a mental disorder but also a mental disorder can also lead to a substance abuse, it is not known which comes first. Like the character which comes first the chicken or the egg. It is said that having one of the diagnosis makes you vulnerable to the other. http//t0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn2wcgJmOO5cR8aMhttp//deepwarriors.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/chicken-egg.jpgMANAGERIAL/POLICY RECOMMENDATIONSWhy people who are having a mental disorder are so prone to drug abuse raises a lot of questions collectible to the limited research done on the topic. The research so far is inconsistent and has failed to address a number of issues. There is a need for more research as well as more treatment center that are equipped to deal with dual diagnosis. The patient has two brain diseases that influence one another, and which both need treatment, at the same time. This is when dual diagnosis treatment is need. It is an approach used by clinicians to treat individuals affected by two co-occurring or coexistent conditions simultaneously. Dual diagnosis affects a person physically, mentally, spiritually, emotionally and socially. There is a need for an all-inclusive approach that identifies both disorders, evaluates both disorders, and at the same time treats both disorders. Many treatment centers now only treat one or the other. Substance abuse treatment are not recommended or designed to handle a mental illness and unrighteousness versa. Awareness about the problem needs to be made public, so that people know the signs to look for and how to approach the person about their disorder correctly. Patients also need to be aware of the help that is available to them and support groups like Dual recovery Anonymous. There also needs to be better training for the counselors and physicians so that they will be able to better and accurately diagnosis patien ts. For recovery to be successful you moldiness treats a clients addiction and mental health problem.http//www.bghealth.org/images/support%20group%20gif.gifWas Che Guevara a Successful subversive?Was Che Guevara a Successful Revolutionary?The principal subject of historical line of tenablenessing surrounding Che Guevara is whether or not he succeeded as a revolutionist. The tump over can let quite implausible as some study him as a folk hero of mythical proportions. There is a sense of irony in that Guevara has become worldwide fascination as a commercial product, although Guevaras motive for the new uprising was to conquer capitalism. This thesis will argue the manners in which Guevaras legacy has been received and see (listed below), as well as identifying the origins of his profound popularity.Description of Preliminary look and Research IntentionsMain areas or issues you plan to discuss in your showThe overall focus is the interpretation of Che Guevara and his legac y over time. With this, the main topics of the get by areThe life of Che Guevara was one of controversy and thereby one moldiness place emphasis into questioning the significance he holds in the pantheon of transnational revolutionary heroes and ideals. Herewith, the historian must evaluate Guevaras success from a governmental/empiricist perspective.The complete commitment to the revolutionary effort to create a unseasoned man and a just/social order that continues to stir those who shin against social injustice. With this, one must investigate how these ideals impact on the post-Guevara population of modern-day edict. To do this the historian must evaluate Guevaras success from a social perspective.Guevara has become a popular symbol while his image is too often dissociated from the legend that built it. With this, one must evaluate how and why his image has become a dominant face of modern popular culture. In relation to this debate, Guevara has ironically become an impo rtant image for money-wielding capitalists. Therefore, the historian must evaluate Guevaras success from a determinist/ economical perspective.Project SynopsisThe thesis explores specifically whether or not Che Guevara succeeded as a semi semipolitical revolutionary and a placeful icon in contemporary popular culture after his death. Guevaras life provides a meaningful historical debate as Guevara has often been criticised as a murderer, a hypocrite and a misadventure. His attempt to unite several Latin-the Statesn nations under a communist rule was unsuccessful, although he is often regarded as a hero to many of the inhabitants of these countries.The precise thesis question to be cerebrate on is Evaluate the changing views on Ernesto Che Guevaras success and legacy watch outing(a) his death in 1967 to the present day. This question was developed as an probe into how and why Guevara obtained an iconic stead in society, and whether or not he is regarded as being a success or a reverse. Originally, this question focused only on Guevaras failed attempt of uniting Latin-American nations and position an inquiry into why Guevara became so popular. Through thorough research and donnish critique, it was discovered that there were more sophisticated elements to the thesis question.The life of Che Guevara was one of controversy and thereby one must place emphasis into questioning the significance he holds in the pantheon of outside(a) revolutionary heroes and ideals. Guevara made a complete commitment to the revolutionary grapple to create a parvenu man and a just/social order that continues to inspire those who struggle against social injustice. Herewith, one must investigate how these ideals impact on the post-Guevara population of modern-day society. Guevara has also become a popular symbol while his image is too often dissociated from the legend that built it. With this, one must evaluate how and why his image has become a dominant face of contemporar y popular culture, as well as the face of market placeisation. varied historians have produced varying answers to the specific question. In the thesis, the strength of these claims is explored in an attempt to resolve the issue of whether Guevara succeeded or not, but the sources themselves their motivation, influences and perspective are also explored to ensure that the different historical perspectives are not simply described, but evaluated. This focus question is resultantly a mix of history and historiography.Project set aboutErnesto Che Guevara remains a potent iconic presence in society, with his life the subject of naked as a jaybird biographies, his mug on T-shirts, and his highly-regarded influence in the political spectrum. The Argentinean-born guerilla leader who helped Fidel Castro seize power in Cuba in 1959 remains one of the few unsullied heroes available to the political left. His thoughts (as evidenced in his book, Guerilla Warfare) on revolutionary strategy , bureaucracy, education, economics, the role of the party, internationalisticism, attitude to work and democratic centralism have been regarded as the force behind the Latin-American Revolutions. Guevara had an indomitable tactile sensation in the worth of education and was self-taught in economics and Marxism. Marxs concept that it is not enough to interpret the world, it must be transformed was at the shopping centre of Guevaras life. Guevara strongly believed that key analytical concepts must be adapted and modify by practice.Guevara felt that the struggle against capitalism and the construction of a naked as a jaybird socialist society required a new type of gentle being who would be willing to make personal sacrifices for the well-being of others. historiographer Richard Harris states, His life as a revolutionary was a success as evidenced by the continuing significance he holds in the pantheon of international revolutionary heroes and ideals. The example he set of com plete commitment to the revolutionary struggle to create a new man, freed from his mania, educated and ready to struggle every day for his liberty and a just social/international order continues to inspire those who struggle against social injustice and oppression and seek to create a new social order based on the ideals of socialism. In this context, Che has in death succeeded more than he ever could have imagined. historian Siles del Valle argues rather convincingly that Guevaras views on the new man propel him, his comrades and the young Bolivian revolutionaries who followed in their footsteps a few years later to sacrifice their lives for a new society and a new kind of human being.Many of the adherents of this theology of the new man established close links with popular revolutionary movements throughout the region. In Bolivia, after the failure of Guerillas guerilla movement, and in other countries such as Chile, Brazil and Peru, the most progressive sectors of the church, i nfluenced by the ideals of liberation theology, associated themselves with red ink and neo-Marxist revolutionary movements. In Bolivia, this course resulted in the participation of certain younger members of the Christian Democratic party in a revolutionary guerilla movement that attempted to establish a base of operations in 1970 around the mining town of Teoponte, north of the capital of La Paz.Although the idea of guerilla warfare was no longer accepted as a viable form of resistor to the military regime at the time, important elements within the Bolivian people began to idealize and even venerate the guerillas. Historian Siles de Valle illustrates the importance of how Guevaras death, his concept of the new man, the ideals of liberation theology, and the political movements divine by Guevaras example have influenced Bolivian popular literature and regime right up to the present.This influence is translucent in that the first indigenous president of Bolivia, Evo Morales, is said to be re-launching Guevaras wander of a savages revolution in the country. Morales stated that he admires Guevara because, he fought for comparison and for justice. He did not just care for ordinary people he made their struggle his own. The Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for occidental Hemisphere affairs, Roger Pardo-Maurer IV, states, You have a revolution going on in Bolivia, a revolution that potentially could have consequences as far-reaching as the Cuban revolution of 1959. What is going on in Bolivia today could have repercussions in Latin America and elsewhere that you could be dealing with for the rest of your lives. Che Guevara seek to ignite a war based on igniting a peasant revolution This project is back. Herewith, Evo Morales could become the countrys first authentically politically left-winger president.In contrast, Historian Jay Mallin provides the argument that Guevaras influence was ineffective in Bolivia. He states that, charisma is never enou gh when it comes to leftist movements. The fate of Che Guevara, who failed to foment a Latin American revolution and left no coherent social model behind for his followers, should have taught us that already. Mallin also believes that Guevara had no blueprint to be in Bolivia. Mallin affirms that, the peasants displayed exact or no interest in aiding him Guevara. During the 1950s, Bolivia had undertaken agrarian reform, and most of the peasants now owned their own land. A high-level Bolivian official chitchated What could Che offer them? Cabinet posts? Mallins comment indicates that although Guevara was attempting to eradicate the alienation of the individuals on behalf of the population, the peasant majority perceived him as worthless as they had already been benefiting from the capitalists agrarian reform schemes.Mallin considers Guevara to be a failure due to the fact that he was a leading theoretician and advocate of guerilla warfare, but he failed in an attempt to apply his own doctrines. Since Castro came to power in 1959, he and Guevara had launched or encouraged more than a xii guerilla operations throughout Latin America. Not one of these has succeeded in overthrowing a government several have been wiped out completely and some still splutter along.Although much criticism of Guevara and his legacy emanates from the political center and right, there has also been criticism from other political groups such as anarchists and civil libertarians, Bolivian officials and right-wing conservatives, some of whom considered Guevara an authoritarian, anti-working-class Stalinist, whose goal was the creation of a more bureaucratic state-Stalinist regime.Mallins irrefutable argument is that Guevara was a man of long capabilities, but he chose to employ these talents in pursuit of violence as a means to a political end. A doctor by profession, Guevara chose not to serve humanity selflessly, but rather to serve collectivism selflessly. And this indeed he did, relinquishing power and position in order to begin, literally, from scratch once again, to risk his life a new time in obedience to his tortured ideas. Therefore, Guevara can be considered a failure when evaluating his legacy within a political context. Although his attempt at unifying the Latin American nations provided him with an iconic status, the contemporary effort by politicians to follow in Guevaras footsteps has been deemed unsuccessful (except for Cuba as it still survives and was a critical primer coat for the Bay of Pigs Invasion in 1961), especially with the Bolivian president Evo Morales, who has little hope of fulfilling the expectations of his followers.Called the most complete human being of our age by the French philosopher Jean-Paul Sartre, Guevaras supporters believe he may yet prove to be the most important thinker and activist in Latin America since Simon Bolivar. The most important factor of Guevaras legacy after his death was his status as a popular icon, s ymbolizing revolution and left-wing political ideals among youngsters in atomic number 74ern and Middle Eastern Cultures. A dramatic scene of Guevara taken by photographer Alberto Korda soon became one of the centurys most perceptible images, and the portrait was simplified and reproduced on a vast array of merchandise, such as T-shirts, posters, coffee mugs and baseball caps.When Guevara died, millions mourned his passing. Poets and philosophers wrote impassioned eulogies to him, musicians composed tributes, and painters rendered his portrait in a myriad of heroic poses. Marxist guerillas in Asia, Africa and Latin America anxious to revolutionize their societies held his banner aloft as they went into battle. And, as the juvenility in the United States and Western Europe rose up against the established order over the Vietnam War, racial prejudice, and social orthodoxy, Guevaras defiant visage became the supreme icon of their fervent protest on influencing government policies. Guevaras body might have vanished, but his spirit has lived on Guevara was nowhere and everywhere at once. As Jorge Castaneda so aptly states in his evaluation of Guevara, Many of us today owe the few attractive and redeeming features of our daily humankind to the sixties, and Che Guevara personifies the era, if not the traits, better than anyone.Latin-American Historians Castaneda, Anderson and Taibo examine the extent to which Guevara was committed to both fomenting socialist revolution on a truly international subdue and personally putting into practice his thesis that it was possible for a shrimpy but committed guerrilla fighting force to ignite a full-scale popular revolution in Latin-American nations saddled by oppressive regimes and U.S. imperialism. His commitment to these beliefs was shared by most of his closest friends and comrades as well as many admirers and sympathizers around the world.Guevara exemplified the principles of individual sacrifice, honesty, dedication to cause, and personal conviction in his beliefs. In fact, the example he created by the way he lived his life and met his death has make ited time and ideology to nurture and inspire new generations of fighters and dreamers. Guevaras defiant visage, as Anderson believes, has become the ultimate icon of revolutionary spirit and commitment in the late twentieth century. Guevara was truly a man who died for his beliefs, and because of his almost mythical self-sacrifice for his revolutionary ideals he has been the single most important figure of veneration for revolutionaries and guerilla fighters around the world.Historian Castaneda links Guevaras legacy to what he sees as the legacy of the international younkerfulness revolt that took place in the 1960s This is the being legacy of that decade. It is also what made Guevara the perfect fit, the supreme emblem of that cultural revolt a man whose politics were conventional but whose attitude toward power and politics attained epic and unique dimensions This component of Guevaras legacy can be evidenced through the increased involvement of the New left wing youth revolts during the 1960s. The New Left sought to modify, rather than overthrow capitalism. It sought to make capitalism more inclusive and better share the massive riches the United States enjoyed in the postwar period making the New Left relevant as this was a constituent of Guevaras ideologies. Castaneda supports his argument by stating that Che can be foundin the niches reserved for cultural icons, for symbols of social uprisings that drool down deep into the soil of society, but while there is fairness in this assertion it is also clear that Guevaras legacy is greater than this. Bolivian literature, as exemplified by Harris, is testimony to the influence on Bolivian society of Ches guerilla mission and death.Though he is seen by many as a hero, opponents of Guevara, including Cuban exiles, think of him as a killer and terrorist. They raze t o what they see as the less savoury aspects of Guevaras life, taking the viewpoint that he was enthusiastic about executing opponents of the Cuban Revolution. Some of Guevaras writing is cited as evidence of this tendency, as quoted in an article by Alvaro Vargas Llosa. In his sum to the Tricontinental, Llosa writes of hatred as an element of struggle unbending hatred for the enemy, which pushes a human being beyond his natural limitations, making him into an effective, violent, selective, and cold-blooded cleansing machine.Critics in the United States assert that Che Guevara was responsible for the torture and execution of hundreds of people in Cuban prisons, and the murder of many more peasants in the regions controlled or visited by his guerilla forces. Contrary to Guevara supporters, these critics also argue that Guevara was a blundering tactician with no recorded combat victories. While supporters point to the Battle of Santa Clara as a major victory of Guevara, historian Alv aro Vargas Llosa writes, his greatest military achievement in the fight against Batista taking the city of Santa Clara after ambushing a train with sedate reinforcements is seriously disputed. Numerous testimonies indicate that the commander of the train surrendered in advance, perhaps after taking bribes. They believe that Guevara murdered individuals on dubious thou and took their property, seized private manors for himself, and distributed property among communist bureaucrats rather than the peasants. The critics also state that he helped institute forced labour camps when communist volunteerism had failed. Herewith, his social legacy has proved to be notorious as early followers of Guevara have had to communicate hate in order to be attain freedom.A similar element of Guevaras legacy is his success and veneration within an economic context. Guevara believed that the revolutionary regime needed to promote the development among Cubas working class of a new communist consci ousness based on moral rather than material incentives. He also believed strongly that the regime needed to stick with a centralised budgetary system for the equitable allocation of resources between different sectors of the economy in order to build socialism in Cubas corrupt and underdeveloped economy. He was vehemently opposed to what has today become the market strategy in the remaining few socialist countries marketisation, material incentives, and enterprise financial self-management. Anderson believes that Guevaras image is lionised by commercial profiteers around the world. Entrepreneurs have used and abused Guevaras visage in a variety of ways including ice-cream flavours, revolutionary tacos and is even the public face of Cuba in relation to tourism.Although Guevaras Marxist and economic ideologies were systematic and meticulous, he failed at managing the Cuban economy, as he oversaw the near-collapse of sugar production, the failure of industrialisation, and the intro duction of rationing. In a broader sense, some critics, such as Che-Mart (author unknown), have merchandised their dislike of Guevara by marketing burlesque T-shirts at both Guevara and his supporters, casting aspersions, for example, on what they perceive as an irony. The irony can be evidenced in that Guevara was a motivated communist who lived the last years of his life as a revolutionary figure, in order to abolish American capitalism throughout Latin America, but is now one of capitalisms hottest selling images. The creator of Che-mart.com has written, Che has marketed his brand name brilliantly over the years, selling to specific niche in the market young people who have no clue what Che has done or what he stands for. The specie continues to flow as most college dorms world-wide are being adorned with his face. This comment eradicates Guevaras initial purpose and ideals of a world free of capitalism. Herewith, Guevaras legacy in an economic context is an ironic one, as what he fought against for so many years has allowed market oligopolies to take advantage and use his well-known visage to achieve what entrepreneurs love most large profit margins from effective market capitalism.The complex facets of Che Guevaras revolutionary movement have created a mixture of interpretations through the passage of time, causing a distortion in the Guevara legend. He is singled out from other revolutionaries by many young people in the West because he rejected a comfortable bourgeois background to fight for those who were deprived of political power and economic stability. However, as evidenced in the thesis, Guevara was unsuccessful in his fight against peasant exploitation and Western capitalism. It is for this reason that Guevaras legacy is considered as rather disproportionate and can be regarded as a failure, when evaluating his political and economic success as a revolutionary. Paradoxically, Guevara can be considered a success as he has become a popular symbol while his image is too often dissociated from the school of thought that built it. It is the vulnerability of Guevaras spirit that makes him a contemporary hero although he might have failed as a revolutionary, he has somehow kept up(p) a powerful hold on the popular imagination, seeming to transcend time and place his legacy continues to influence not only those who were inspired by him then but also those who are discovering him today.