Anti Nature Concept by Nietzsche Essay

The construct of Nietzsche occupies one of the leading places among the greatest philosophers till nowadays. His influences can be traced in postmodernism and existentialism. His theories and views atomic number 18 analyze by scientists and students his profound and sharp sense of macrocosm and human nature attract attention of numerous lot on the building block over the world. His most well-known theory is related to Will of force play. The notion of the superhuman Uebermensh as a key to understanding of the power, each human being is bearing inside(a), totally confronts the general philosophic glide slope , where all reasons and questions are investigated only the in the frames of sole truth. These ides are real in his work The Twilight of the Idols, where the readers find Nietzsches strong confrontation of the Socratess approach of rationalism. His strongest critic of the Socratess views relates to lack of lifespan cargo hold and resistance of the human instincts, because he states, that Resisting instincts is fair a sickness and not at all a way back to virtue or happiness. (Bailey 2002). Here we are coming closer to the major point of our research, videlicet to the understanding of morality. One of the most vital concepts of Nietzsche was his suggestion, that morality builds the serious rampart for enjoying of most of life passions and desires, or how he formulated it morality as anti-nature.In his work Morality as Anti-Nature Nietzsche is discussing the ways, how worship and morality, spread via religion, are able to change and suppress human nature. Nowadays a apportion of people are living according to some biblical rules and precepts. During the times, when Nietzsche lived, the church building was considered to be even a stronger mentor for most individuals, who made their choices and selected their life directions only based on the rules, preached by the priests. Nietzsche was absolutely against it he insisted that religion did n ot consider the nature of humanity. According to the church all people were to fight against their bad sides, where according to Nietzsche all people were born ab initio good and they did not need the religious rules to follow them, but sooner follow their own desires andpassions. The highest potential in development throughout the whole life can be reached, as Nietzsche stated, only with the help of inside passions, and never the topicls of church. The church demanded from its followers to suppress all the passions in fellowship to become real Christians. In this way the church was exchanging the natural passions of individuals with morality.The idea of free will was withal unders aliked by Nietzsche not in the way as it was presented by the church. The believers were supposed to follow all the matinee idols rules as he was the most powerful being, at the identical time, they were to carry responsibility for their decisions and actions. Today we no longer have all pity for t he concept of free will we know only too well what it really is the foulest of all theologians artifices, aimed at making mankind amenable in their sense, that is, dependent upon them. Here I simply supply the psychology of all making responsible. (Bailey 2002). At this point Nietzsche used this theory for explaining his understanding of cause and effect. The churchs use of counterfactual causality expands to an conceptional and false perception in the mind, and people ultimately jump to conclusions, big all the credit to a higher form or being. (Bailey 2002). Nietzsche also criticized the situation when instead of looking for plausible answers. The followers of the church just believed, that the word of God was the only true reason. Thus Christianity, as he wrote, was to bear the responsibility for making its followers closed minded and passing game against their nature. He ultimately believed that religion creates a concept of anti-natural morality which reparation our deve lopment as humans quite greatly, eventually ending our billet and right as individuals once the church gets involved (Jacobus 13).In Nietzsches eyes, it was an attempt to substitute all the intelligence and natural passions, human beings were possessing, with concealment and poor spirituality. In this case, he stated, that those, who could invent all such spiritual and moral restrictions, were ill-willed and not able to control their own passions. They themselves were not attached to further intellectual and moral development, thus they used morality as anti-nature to restrict other individuals in improvement of their lives. Only individuals, who are absolutely not under control of any morality, could be referred to as apotheosis human beings, because their actions and choices would be based purely upon their natural passions. Their judgments concerning right and amiss(p) things would be under the influence oftheir inside passion only. Overall, we have studied the key notions o f the Nietzsches theory, related to the issues of morality, which according to him is the most serious breastwork in formation of life direction, based on the natural instincts and passions. On the one hand, he could be right saying that morality itself is certainly restraining the activities and decisions of people. However, on the other hand our ability to control our emotions and passions is the major feature, which defines us as human beings, not animals.Works citedBailey, A. First Philosophy natural Problems and Readings in Philosophy. Broadview pressure sensation. 2002Jacobus L.A. A World of Ideas Essential Readings for College Writers. Bedford/St. Martins. 2013Hayman, R. Nietzsche A Critical Life. Oxford University Press (New York), 1980.