Cloning is Unethical :: essays research papers

In upstart years our world has undergone many changes and advancements, cloning is a primary pillow slip of this new modernism. On July 5th, 1995, Dolly, the first cloned animal, was created. She was cloned from a half-dozen-year-old sheep, making her cells contractableally six years old at her creation. However, scientists were amazed to see Dolly hold for another six years, until she died early 2005 from a common lung disease entrap in sheep. This discoery sparked a curiosity for cloning all over the world, however, mankind must suffice a question, should cloning be allowed? To answer this question some issues need to be explored. Is cloning morally correct, is it a reliable way to produce life, and should human experimentation be allowed? Scientists bring forth no problem with the ethical issues cloning poses, as they claim the technological benefits of cloning clearly step to the foreweigh the possible social consequences, not to mention, sustain people with deadly dis eases to find a cure. Jennifer Chan, a junior at the New York City Lab School, said, ?cloning body organs exit help save many patients lives, she said. I think that cloning is an frightening medical breakthrough, and the process could period of time at cloning organs--if were accountable, it doesnt have to go any further. This argument seems to be an ethical presentation of the purpose of cloning. However, most, if not all scientists agree that human cloning won?t stop in that location. While cloning organs may seem ethical, cloning a human is dangerous. Still, scientists argue that the intentions of cloning are ethical. On the other hand, there are many who disagree with those claims. According to those from a religious stand mind, it is play God, therefore, should be avoided. From a scientific standpoint it is also very dangerous, as scientists are playing with human cells which, if done wrong, can lead to genetic mutations that can either become fatal to the clone, or cause it mischievous disabilities. This information does, in fact, question the moral of the issue. If cloning is unsafe and harmful, what is the point? Another argument pertains to the reliability of cloning. Cloning experts have claimed it is, in fact, an efficacious procedure. Scientists have admitted it is risky, but also have argued that with time, and more experimentation, cloning leave behind become extremely reliable and effective. However, facts are not as confirming towards this claim as scientists may want. Currently only 3 extinct of 71 cloning eggs have lived, and only 1 out of 278 fully developed clones have survived from those eggs.