Aung San and Faith Bandler Essay

?Today, lack of par and slumber treaty are prominent issues which shape the world. Such things are demonstrated in Aung San Suu Kyis speech, Key none Address at the Beijing World conference on Women and creed Bandlers speech, credit, Hope and Reconciliation through the function of various wording devices. The common uses of emotive speech communication between the deuce texts greatly affect the audience as it creates a sense of humanity and unity. For example, ASSK states, The agitate for democracy and human rights in Burma is a struggle for spirit and dignity.It is a struggle that encompasses our political, social and economic aspirations. the repetitive use of struggle emphasizes the hardships for the people of Burma and their desire for freedom. It is a struggle for young girls to be control to sexual slavery w here they are subject to constant humiliation, on that point is a struggle for freedom, dignity and security. Her use of emotive language and repeating enab les the audience to sympathise with her and the people of Burma that the causes of these struggles are lack of equality and peace in the world or our global village.Similarly in Faith Bandlers speech, emotive language and repetition are accepted once again to unify the audience and the speaker to create a sense of sympathy which draws upon the theme of inequality and peace. It was a rather decelerate process for her to understand, when there are millionswho are hungry, millions who are homeless, millions who are without work, the wrongfully imprisoned, the deaths in custody, the torturedwhy is it so hard to find our commonalities? , Faith stresses the absurdity of how difficult it is for people to find commonalities with her use of repetition of millions.Its becomes a problem when millions are hungry, homeless and jobless as it portrays our society as unequal. The rhetorical questions asked throughout her speech such as why is it so hard to find our commonalities? and what is rec onciliation about? state the obvious truths, that it isnt hard to find reconciliation or peace within the world. Faith demonstrates a world of inequality through the use of emotive language and repetition. Suu kyi and Bandlers speeches are effective in connecting to their audience when demonstrating the theme of equality and peace.Both activists demonstrate unity to the audience by using comprehensive language and counterbalance person. For example, as Suu Kyi acknowledges the strong and principled women who have lobbied for her release, I cannot let this opportunity pass without speaking of the gratitude we feel towards our sisters everywhere. The use of first person and inclusive language is evident throughout the speech, it illustrates a individualized approach to her audience as well as clearly word-painting her firm views of women. Bandlers speech is also evident of the use of these devices.By using first person throughout her speech, it indicates her familiarity with the audience as she was here once before and also shows that she speaks from a personal experience self-aggrandising the audience an idea of what she has been through such as her work in campaigning and co founding various companies. In order to get the audience about reconciliation whether its the youth or the not so young, her use of first person and inclusive language connects to the audience. Both ASSK and Bandler bring their audiences together as a whole to fancy at common issues of the world and better ways to bring peace.