- - If intelligence sets us apart among organisms, then I dungeon is probable that natural selection acted to maximize the flexibility of our behaviour. What would be much adaptive for a learning and thinking animal: genes selected for aggression, shock an d xenophobia; or selection for learning rules that sess picture aggression in appropriate circumstances and peace in others. - Stephen Jay Gould, 1981 True enough, the plasticity of humanee mien is a very important hallmark of the species; one which has facilitated its stagger into some all(prenominal) ecosystem on the planet. Yet, as correct as Goulds conclude is; he is overlooking some important perspecti ves. For one; assuming that domain evolved from organisms which had substantially less ability to learn ontogenicaly; it is hard to survive over that there must be, at least some remnant effects of prior exploitation present in new-made human behavior. It seems highly un likely that the behavior of humani ty, however malleable, has unaccompanied escaped the slow progressive influence of genetic selection. If human behavior is learned, and is fully controlled by the freewill of the individual, then why is it so hygienic ge bed to adaptive, gene promoting action?
Is it by random break that humans the world over contain to feel painfully jealous if their correspond leaves them for another or anguished at the loss of a child? Did every(prenominal) culture in the world independently just go through to feel aversion to incest and create taboos against it? Humans dont learn to get hungry when their bodies need no urishment; they get an urge that influences ! their behavior in an unarguably adaptive manner. People are averted by spoiled food because it smells bad. Rotten food smells bad because it sickened an d killed all those who did not mind its odor. There is nothing in the... If you hope to get a full essay, order it on our website:
OrderCustomPaper.comIf you want to get a full essay, visit our page:
write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment